Since I've already posted one letter to the editor, I've posted another letter that I found hilarious. You may not agree, but take a look.

'Character Studies'
To the Editor:
I can remember when Tina Brown was in charge of The New Yorker and a writer named Mark Singer interviewed me for a profile. He was depressed. I was thinking, O.K., expect the worst. Not only was Tina Brown dragging The New Yorker to a new low, this writer was drowning in his own misery, which could only put me in a skeptical mood regarding the outcome of their combined interest in me. Misery begets misery, and they were a perfect example of this credo.

Jeff MacGregor, the reviewer of "Character Studies," a collection of Singer's New Yorker profiles (Aug. 21), including the one about me, writes poorly. His painterly turn with nasturtiums sounds like a junior high school yearbook entry. Maybe he and Mark Singer belong together. Some people cast shadows, and other people choose to live in those shadows. To each his own. They are entitled to their choices.
Most writers want to be successful. Some writers even want to be good writers. I've read John Updike, I've read Orhan Pamuk, I've read Philip Roth. When Mark Singer enters their league, maybe I'll read one of his books. But it will be a long time — he was not born with great writing ability. Until then, maybe he should concentrate on finding his own "lonely component" and then try to develop himself into a worldclass writer, as futile as that may be, instead of having to write about remarkable people who are clearly outside of his realm.
I've been a best-selling author for close to 20 years. Whether you like it or not, facts are facts. The highly respected Joe Queenan mentioned in his article "Ghosts in the Machine" (March 20) that I had produced "a steady stream of classics" with "stylistic seamlessness" and that the "voice" of my books remained noticeably constant to the point of being an "astonishing achievement." This was high praise coming from an accomplished writer. From losers like Jeff MacGregor, whom I have never met, or Mark Singer, I do not do nearly as well. But I'll gladly take Joe Queenan over Singer and MacGregor any day of the week — it's a simple thing called talent!
I have no doubt that Singer's and MacGregor's books will do badly — they just don't have what it takes. Maybe someday they'll astonish us by writing something of consequence.
DONALD TRUMP
New York

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/books/review/11letters.html?pagewanted=all

Ha ha ha. That letter is hilarious.

Actually when I first skimmed my eyes over what you'd posted, I was confused-- I thought you were sending me a letter you wrote and then got to the signed name "Donald Trump" Which was funny, too.

Did you see that the original article by Queenan that Trump invokes is an article about ghost writers? Yes. And this is the beginning of the paragraph Trump quotes from:

One of the few ''authors'' who have succeeded in avoiding the pitfalls that increasingly ensnare ghostwritees
is Donald Trump.

Amazing, I know. So Trump should have written that he's been a best-selling "author"-- not author-- for years.

Gwyneth darling, can I ask as a favor that you post your comments on blog.hissycat.com? I want to eventually phase (sp?) out this xanga. I've already copied all the xanga content over to the new site, but I haven't found a program that will let me grab the comments.

And don't worry, there's no need to disclose your identity. I've enabled the comments board to accept from anyone. Just sign your name Gwyneth, or something. Thanks.

And, really: thank you for the letter. I mean, wow.

Best,
Oed/ Joanna/ Hissycat